As iPhone sales in China continue to decline, two of the country’s biggest online retailers are offering discounts of up to $350 on certain models.
While sales are rare in the US, to say the least, Apple or local resellers have regularly offered iPhone discounts in China. It will be because iPhone sales continue to decline in the country, but also because China has key shopping seasons, including “618” in June.
Ahead of this year’s “618” shopping season, Reuters reports that two of China’s biggest online resellers have launched promotional offers on the iPhone 16 range. Such sales are now an annual fixture in China, but reportedly this time the discounts are particularly high.
The sites are JD.com — which in 2021 sold $15.6 million of the iPhone 13 in its first two seconds on sale — and Alibaba’s Tmall marketplace. The two stores have differing offers, but they are up to approximately $350 off the retail price.
For comparison, the “618” festival in 2024 saw discounts of up to $180. In the same year, a mix of discounts and related trade-in offers added up to a possible $225 off the price of an iPhone during China’s Singles Day.
It’s not clear whether the discounts will last through the whole of “618,” which runs from June 1, 2025, to June 18, 2025. It’s also not clear whether it’s Apple or the resellers who are behind the price cut.
But for now, JD.com is selling a 128GB iPhone 16 Pro for approximately $758, or around $350 below the regular asking price. Coincidentally, it is also selling a 256GB iPhone 16 for the same price, which is around $212 below retail price.
Alibiba’s Tmall marketplace is selling the 128GB iPhone 16 Pro for fractionally more at around $763. However, that discount requires buyers to use coupons, some of which reportedly include government subsidies.
During Apple’s latest earnings call, CEO Tim Cook explained that in general if a product costs more than around $830, it is not eligible for the Chinese subsidies. Nonetheless, Cook raised the subsidies as a factor in Apple’s iPhone sales in China.
“I do believe that the subsidies [had] a favorable impact on the results,” he said. “It’s difficult to estimate with precision as to, you know, exactly how much, but I think it was positive.”